Integrity compromised image sample report
FauxScan classified this bridge image as integrity compromised because boundary-level compression analysis found a strong localized anomaly consistent with a possible pasted region, sky replacement, or compositing boundary.
- What FauxScan found
- The scan found no C2PA credentials, no EXIF metadata, moderate ELA levels, a strong boundary-local compression anomaly, no localized JPEG Ghost mismatch, and a human-origin detector result.
- C2PA and provenance
- No C2PA Content Credentials were found. The integrity concern comes from image-forensic signals rather than signed provenance.
- Metadata
- No EXIF metadata was present, so the report could not use camera make, model, capture time, or GPS data to support source verification.
- Why it matters
- This sample shows how FauxScan can separate AI-origin questions from integrity questions. A human-origin detector result can coexist with localized evidence that the image may have been altered.
- Limitations
- The report does not prove exactly what was changed. Boundary and ELA findings should guide manual inspection, comparison to originals, and source-context review.